top of page

Why minimse ventricular pacing

Why minimise ventricular pacing?: Welcome

Ventricular pacing > 40% of the time in DDDR mode was associated with a 2.6-fold increased risk of heart failure hospitalization as compared with < 40% V-pacing. (MOST)

​

The risk of AF increased linearly with increasing cumulative percent V-pacing from 0% pacing up to 80-85% pacing in both DDDR and VVIR pacing modes.(MOST/SAVE-PACE)

​

Long-term DDDR pacing induces LA dilation, and a high proportion of RV pacing decreases LV function.(DANISH II)

Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About
Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About

MOST

Adverse effects of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction (2003)

​

time to first heart failure hospitilisation (HFH) by cumulative VP % show an early, sustained and increasing incidence of HFH among DDDR patients with cumulative VP % >40% compared with <40% and among VVIR patients with cumulative VP % >80% compared with <80%

​

time to first episode of AF by cumulative VP % show an early, sustained and increasing incidence of AF among DDDR and VVIR patients with increasing cumulative VP %

most1.jpg
Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About
most2.jpg
Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About

SAVE-PACE

Minimising Ventricular pacing to reduce AF in SND (2007)

​

Support the use of AAI-DDD based modes in DDD over conventional DDD programming

​

Results

•AF lower in AAI-DDD group

   (12.7% vs 7.9%)

Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About
savepace.png
Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About

DANPACE / DANISH

A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome (2003)

​

Compared AAI with DDD short AVs and DDD long Avs

High RV pacing results in decrease in LV function

Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About

DAVID

Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial.(2002)

​

In pts with intact AV conduction, RV pacing >40% leads to an increase in death and HFH

Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About

Conclusions from studies

Unnecessary/increased RV pacing can lead to

•Increased AF

•Decrease in LV function

•Increase in HFH

Increase in death

Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About
Why minimise ventricular pacing?: About
bottom of page